What statistical significance is
Statistical significance answers one question: could the difference observed between variations have
come up by chance? If the probability of chance is low, the result counts as significant.
Mathematically this is expressed through the p-value. p < 0.05 means that, assuming there is no real
effect, the probability of getting a divergence this large or larger is under 5%.
Variation A: CR = 2.10% (n = 12,400)
Variation B: CR = 2.47% (n = 12,500)
Difference: +0.37 pp, lift +17.6%
p-value = 0.031 → significant at α = 0.05
Important: significance confirms that the difference is reliable, not that it matters. A
difference can be statistically significant and commercially insignificant at the same time.
Two approaches: frequentist and Bayesian
| Parameter | Frequentist | Bayesian |
|---|---|---|
| Primary metric | p-value | Probability to be best |
| Threshold | p < 0.05 (α = 0.05) | ≥ 95% probability |
| Stopping early | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Interpretation | Technical | Intuitive |
For e-commerce the Bayesian approach is preferable: it lets you stop a test early and correctly when
there is a clear winner, and it does not require the marketing team to understand what a p-value is.
Significance level and statistical power
Two key parameters are set when an experiment is planned:
- Significance level (α) — the acceptable probability of a false positive, a type I error. The
standard is α = 0.05. - Statistical power (1 − β) — the probability of detecting a real effect when one exists. The
standard is 80%.
Both are fixed before the test starts and they directly determine the sample size required. Moving
the thresholds after the fact to push a result through is data manipulation.
Significance and MDE: how they connect
Statistical significance is inseparable from the minimum detectable effect (MDE). If the expected CR
lift is 5%, you need one number of participants. If it is 2%, you need several times more. On thin
traffic a test will finish with a non-significant result even when the real effect exists — that is a
type II error.
Common mistakes
- Stopping on the first good-looking number (peeking). Across 20 interim checks, the odds of
seeing p < 0.05 by chance exceed 60%. - Recomputing the threshold after the fact. A result that is almost significant is a
non-significant result. - Confusing significance with effect size. A CR lift of +0.1% can be significant and still not
worth shipping. - Ignoring SRM. If the actual split between groups differs from the configured one, sample ratio
mismatch invalidates the significance calculation entirely.