What statistical significance is

Statistical significance answers one question: could the difference observed between variations have
come up by chance? If the probability of chance is low, the result counts as significant.

Mathematically this is expressed through the p-value. p < 0.05 means that, assuming there is no real
effect, the probability of getting a divergence this large or larger is under 5%.

Variation A: CR = 2.10% (n = 12,400)
Variation B: CR = 2.47% (n = 12,500)
Difference:  +0.37 pp, lift +17.6%
p-value = 0.031  →  significant at α = 0.05

Important: significance confirms that the difference is reliable, not that it matters. A
difference can be statistically significant and commercially insignificant at the same time.

Two approaches: frequentist and Bayesian

Parameter Frequentist Bayesian
Primary metric p-value Probability to be best
Threshold p < 0.05 (α = 0.05) ≥ 95% probability
Stopping early Not allowed Allowed
Interpretation Technical Intuitive

For e-commerce the Bayesian approach is preferable: it lets you stop a test early and correctly when
there is a clear winner, and it does not require the marketing team to understand what a p-value is.

Significance level and statistical power

Two key parameters are set when an experiment is planned:

  • Significance level (α) — the acceptable probability of a false positive, a type I error. The
    standard is α = 0.05.
  • Statistical power (1 − β) — the probability of detecting a real effect when one exists. The
    standard is 80%.

Both are fixed before the test starts and they directly determine the sample size required. Moving
the thresholds after the fact to push a result through is data manipulation.

Significance and MDE: how they connect

Statistical significance is inseparable from the minimum detectable effect (MDE). If the expected CR
lift is 5%, you need one number of participants. If it is 2%, you need several times more. On thin
traffic a test will finish with a non-significant result even when the real effect exists — that is a
type II error.

Common mistakes

  • Stopping on the first good-looking number (peeking). Across 20 interim checks, the odds of
    seeing p < 0.05 by chance exceed 60%.
  • Recomputing the threshold after the fact. A result that is almost significant is a
    non-significant result.
  • Confusing significance with effect size. A CR lift of +0.1% can be significant and still not
    worth shipping.
  • Ignoring SRM. If the actual split between groups differs from the configured one, sample ratio
    mismatch invalidates the significance calculation entirely.