How a points system is built
A points system has three parts: the earning rules, the redemption rules and the communication about
the balance.
Earning: the user receives points for target actions — a purchase, a review, a referral, a
newsletter sign-up, completing a profile. The main source is purchases, at a typical rate of 1% to
5% of the value.
Redemption: points are exchanged for a discount, a free item or another reward. The minimum
redemption threshold — say 500 points — affects retention, because a low threshold increases how
often people use the programme.
Communication: notifications about points earned, warnings about points about to expire and
personalized offers that reference the balance are the key triggers for bringing a user back.
Types of reward
| Type | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|
| A discount on the next purchase | Clear, easy to use | A direct hit to margin |
| Exclusive or early access | No margin impact | Harder for the audience to value |
| A free item | High perceived value | Operationally complex |
| Cashback in points | A familiar format | Needs accounting |
The psychology: why points work
The goal gradient effect: the closer the user is to a threshold, the more often and more quickly
they act. A progress bar saying 3 purchases to the next tier motivates far more strongly than you
have been credited with 230 points.
The endowment effect: once points are sitting in an account, it becomes psychologically harder to
lose them unused. Expiring points push this button hardest.
Comparison with competitors: an accumulated balance creates a switching barrier — moving to a
competitor means giving up what you have built.
Important: a points system is a retention tool, not an acquisition tool. Attracting new
customers on points alone is ineffective; points do their work after the first purchase.
Implementation mistakes
- A redemption threshold that is too high: the user never reaches the required total and loses
interest - No communication: points are credited but the user does not know, and the redemption rate is
close to zero - No expiry: points pile up without moving and the programme loses momentum
- An over-complicated scheme: several types of point and different rates for different categories
confuse people and lower engagement